Adobe just doesn’t get it. The WIRED iPad app, the refund.
Warning: Course language. Rant.
Pure frustration and hate as I write this. I purchased the WIRED iPad application yesterday and I am about to get a refund. Why? Adobe.
Im going to assume you know about the Adobe v. Apple war which flared up when the iPad was released. Flash was absent and Adobe doesn’t like that. So when they promised a cross-compiler Apple decided that, to keep their excellent User Experience and platform stability, cross-compiling is a no go (see 3.3.1 of Apple Dev. Agreement).
Adobe fucked up, promising this cross-compiler that they would be denied using. What did they do with the iPad release looming an publishers that had sided with Adobe looking for other options? They bodged a new solution together. That “solution” is the source of my anger.
The WIRED iPad application, built with Adobe’s bodged solution, is 500MB. Yes that’s right 500MB. They [Adobe] decided that for a magazine lets just pile all the content in the binary. Were they fucking high? Do they not care about users that may not have fast internet or have download restrictions? It failed to download 4 times on my connection. 2 days and still no app.
Thats not the best part. The application just runs on image files, hence the 500MB size. In their news release about the iPad application they boast about it being a rich multimedia experience. <rant> ITS JUST FUCKING IMAGES </rant>
If Adobe is serious about trying to get onto the iPad they need to get their heads out of their arses and use something other than their own technology. Its not 1998 and no you cant get your way, Adobe. Why didn’t they make a framework for the magazine to distribute issues via HTML5 content? Adobe is really stuck on their own technology but if they, for once, used the TRULY open standards like HTML5 maybe they wont have any issues?
What brain dead moron thought putting all the images in the app binary was a good idea. Im a fairly new iPhone/iPad developer and I know thats the worst idea imaginable. It would be better to load the content remotely via, you know, the Internet.
Now to get my money back…







Search